eztv.wf | eztvstatus.org
Search title:  
TV Packs only
 
💬

Canadian Copyright Law introduced; Bill C-61

Join the conversation
🏠 Forum » General » Canadian Copyright Law introduced; Bill C-61
Posted at 12/06/2008, 15:47
#95530
the following is from an e-mail from the government of canada
------

the government of canada has introduced bill c-61, an act to amend the
copyright act. the proposed legislation is a made-in-canada approach that
balances the needs of canadian consumers and copyright owners, promoting
culture, innovation and competition in the digital age.

what does bill c-61 mean to canadians?

specifically, it includes measures that would:

* expressly allow you to record tv shows for later viewing; copy legally
purchased music onto other devices, such as mp3 players or cell phones; make
back-up copies of legally purchased books, newspapers, videocassettes and
photographs onto devices you own; and limit the "statutory damages" a court
could award for all private use copyright infringements;

* implement new rights and protections for copyright holders, tailored to the
internet, to encourage participation in the online economy, as well as stronger
legal remedies to address internet piracy;

* clarify the roles and responsibilities of internet service providers related
to the copyright content flowing over their network facilities; and

* provide photographers with the same rights as other creators.

what bill c-61 does not do:

* it would not empower border agents to seize your ipod or laptop at border
crossings, contrary to recent public speculation

what this bill is not:

* it is not a mirror image of u.s. copyright laws. our bill is made-in-canada
with different exceptions for educators, consumers and others and brings us
into line with more than 60 countries including japan, france, germany and
australia

bill c-61 was introduced in the commons on june 12, 2008 by industry minister
jim prentice and heritage minister jos
Posted at 12/06/2008, 16:20
#95535
can you post that link that was removed from the article? just replace the
http with hxxp. thanks!
Posted at 12/06/2008, 16:21
#95536
was this the link?
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/housepublications/publication.aspx?
docid=3570473&mode=1&language=e
Posted at 12/06/2008, 16:43
#95538
w ww.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/crp-prda.nsf/en/home

(quote his message and you will see)
Posted at 12/06/2008, 19:30
#95546
✎ Quote by scifi3001
w ww.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/crp-prda.nsf/en/home

(quote his message and you will see)


nice tip. i thought it would have just been straight removed from the mysql
database. thanks!
Posted at 13/06/2008, 08:11
#95578
✎ Quote by todayisfun

expressly allow you to record tv shows for later viewing; copy legally
purchased music onto other devices, such as mp3 players or cell phones; make
back-up copies of legally purchased books, newspapers, videocassettes and
photographs onto devices you own; and limit the "statutory damages" a court
could award for all private use copyright infringements;


...unless the copyright holder doesn't want you to!!!

the most important part of that paragraph is the part they left out.

any and all ci rcumvention of software locks is illegal. that means: if the
broadcaster doesn't want you to time-shift or record shows, they set a flag and
it is illegal to ci rcumvent it. if you want to copy your legally purchased cds
onto your mp3 player, then you will be breaking the law by first copying the
songs onto your computer. ditto for dvds.

ans as for the quip about letting border guards seize your ipods etc, that is
not is this bill. it is however, part of the trade agreement (can't remember the
acronym at the moment) currently being discussed.

the best person for fair and balanced coverage of the issue is michael geist.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/

read it. scary stuff.
Posted at 13/06/2008, 08:18
#95579
✎ Quote by todayisfun
the following is from an e-mail from the government of canada

* clarify the roles and responsibilities of internet service providers related
to the copyright content flowing over their network facilities;


forgot about this one.

this means: isps will be required to monitor user's traffic and report anyone
they believe is infringing. it also requires the isps to censor materials as well.

i can't remember of it's in this bill or not, but they are also pushing for
forcing the isps to hand over subscribers info without a court order.

makes me real proud to be a canadian right now... >_<

Posted at 13/06/2008, 10:17
#95587
seems law makers around the world all caught the same "licking the asses of
copyright lobbies in the usa" disease.

at least i can ridicule these fascist pigs because they aren't copyrighted yet.
Posted at 16/06/2008, 17:45
#95959
✎ Quote by numaris
circles say what now???

which fascist pigs would you be referring too...

as far as i know most countries are covered by some sort of copyright...

so you are either talking from your ass, or you have no idea what you just said,

i would go with the later over the former.

and as much as the aussie government likes to lick other countries asses...


does not make us any more ridiculous then you freaks who make such statements...

so go get fucked you little commie consumerist barsted...


wtf? it was a joke. i was obviously referring to the only subject mentioned by
me and joked about how it is not possible to infringe on their copyright on
themselves.

i have absolutely no clue what you are talking about or why communist would
oppose copyright laws.
Posted at 17/06/2008, 13:27
#96091
some people are nice when they're drunk and some people are nasty.
Posted at 18/06/2008, 17:02
#96276
it's ok.
although you should watch out for a slavonic looking guy.

just in case. you never know what's gonna happen next.
ssl  EZTV RSS EZTV Status | EZTV API | upload Upload | DMCA: [email protected]