|
Please login to reply
| 2 of 2 |
|
|||||
|
[#10018]
Written by: stdr [29/12/2006, 14:12] |
|||||
|
damn. what was the budget of this production? they couldn\'t even afford gypsies. |
|||||
|
[#10045]
Written by: skunkworks [30/12/2006, 04:53] |
|||||
|
for those that criticise the bbc, just think where else can you watch good quality broadcaster with out some company tryiong to sell you pointless crap half way through? yeah the budgets are not massive, but that is because they are funded by people in the uk not by coporations trying to squeeeze every last penny out of you. also you have to remember that they are making programs for the majority of people in the uk to watch, like the middle classes, old people etc. so before shooting your mouths off, just think a little. as for faggy leftists in lead roles rofl. why does the lead have to be some muscle bound nit wit? robin hood should be agile and clever, which it comes across as. doctor who should be faster and smarter, which again is portrayed well with this one. havent watched dracula so cannot comment. i for one have had enough of the lead hero bloke being a numpty with more muscles than brains. |
|||||
|
[#10047]
Written by: [email protected] [30/12/2006, 06:12] |
|||||
|
well i am old (61) and my elderly mother (91) lives with us: also living here are my 3 children (15 - 23) and my wife, (52), so i think we represent a good cross section of ages. (middle class - what the fuck is that?) we are all in total agreement that tv over the holiday period was complete garbage except for the vicar of dibley. dr who was a disappointment, torchwood has been crap all along (with exception of episode 2 which we found a hoot - though that was probably unintentional), robin hood is just unbelievably banal (and there's another series being made) and dracula was not worth 5 minutes viewing. in the beebs defense, the other channels were even worse, (the hogfather being an exception). just the fall in number of uploads to the torrent sites i think is a pretty good pointer to the disapointing holiday season (so far). terry |
|||||
|
[#10052]
Written by: Looker760 [30/12/2006, 07:58] |
|||||
|
jedit - i so hope you are not an op because that would mean i would have to abandon eztv like so many other channels that insist on abusing users. i cringe every single time i see a smart-ass childishly rude reply to a reasonable question. you were not born with a mouse in your hand so do try to remember what it was like the first time you booted up (assuming you started at age 10, that would have been last week, yes?) i am sure that some form of rude and foolish rant will follow this post and if jedit is indeed an op i shall be o-so-quickly banned for my disrespect, but honestly i wonder just how long we have to put up with people online in forums like this that we wouldn\'t invite to our house without having the police on standby around the corner in case of trouble. blech and blech on rudeness and happy new year! |
|||||
|
[#10053]
Written by: skunkworks [30/12/2006, 08:23] |
|||||
|
i thought doctor who was pretty good! i just know that even with sky, the most watched channels in my house are bbc1 and 2 the most listened to radio station is radio 1 and possibly the best web site on the planet (content and ease of use) the bbc wins again. all funded by the poeople. plus no adverts! |
|||||
|
[#10150]
Written by: simhedges [31/12/2006, 18:21] |
|||||
|
==== have to agree with many of the comments here about the bbc, it is a total pile of cr*p. and to think people actually have to pay for a tv license in the uk to watch tv, all because of the bbc. biggest rip-off fix ever!!!! ==== tv licence is good value, as far as i\'m concerned - about |
|||||
|
[#10167]
Written by: thehun [01/01/2007, 07:40] |
|||||
|
bitlord is based on the stolen source code of the outdated version 0.56 of the bitcomet core. because of this, certain bugs that have been resolved in later versions of bitcomet are still prevalent in bitlord. the only major changes are advertisements placed on the bitlord interface, and that bitcomet's list of bittorrent sites is replaced with a search box that leads only to affiliates of bitlord. bitlord 1.1 has been confirmed to contain adware. [1]both bitlord and bitlord pro are banned on many private trackers, which may because bitlord pro supports downloading without uploading. |
|||||
|
| 2 of 2 |
|
|||||
