there have been a few threads along this vein recently. i think, in a
nutshell, that the scene decides what to cap and in what format. it's
basically got nothing to do with eztv. they only post what is current,
available and popular.
while we're on the subject, what is the relatively entry-level spec required to
decode the 720p x264 encodes? (with coreavc of course)
specifically, the machine in question is an old athlon 1800xp, so would you
need to step up to a 2500xp barton for example, or would something like a
2200xp be acceptable?
a general guide would be good too, in terms of cpu ghz or 'rating' required.
i'm still on sd tv so hr has no meaning for me (960 x 540 =
unsupported resolution)
the usual sd caps look fine on my tv by the way
the people who have lcd's/plasma's can support (x264) 1280 x 720
so the hr "middle of the road format" basically is not a choice for sd users and
a low quality choice for hd users
it makes sense to me hr versions are dropped in favour of hd versions 😉
have you viewed a hr or 720p rip on a sd tv? i run xbmc through my sd vega and
i can see a huge difference between a 350 hd file, a 700mb hr file and a 720p
file. even though my sd tv does not support the resolutions natively nor does
xbmc play the 720p video smoothly, the quality difference is very obvious. and
like stated, i prefer the ac3 audio on the hrs.
why is eztv no longer listing hr releases of the new
seasons? for example for shows like the csis or bionic woman or heroes?
i wasn't even aware they ever put up hr releases. and before people start
responding with examples when eztv put up hr releases.. i'm being a little
sarcastic here if you can't already tell.
i've always felt, at least as far as the eztv crew is concerned, that hr
releases are only necessary if there is not a good version of the regular hdtv
releases. so as such, there is no need for people to ask why hr releases
aren't being listed anymore.
the answer is simple.. the regular 175 or 350mb releases are amply sufficient.