|
Please login to reply.
| 2 of 3 |
|
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 04:54
|
|||||
| any women out there at all? i need a balanced opinion... | |||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 05:08
|
|||||
|
this... in a world where dexter gets page after page of good episode praise.. why cant they just make a new decent sci fi - not the 'bad humor buffy' style reapers, or the rip off 'ohnoes more termintators' or the 'hold your breath till you die , no really just hold it, honest' losts and all the quirky funny bizarro daisy pushing shows, or the 'roswell meets the oc' vill of small. why not for once, a decent, well thought out, cop-the-lot no cheese thanks, sci fi. no.. just this ?? it's called lipstick jungle ffs.. i am definite that somehow that equates to "sudden death" in the industry... why not a show called "babs and the babes" about 4 ex-cheerleaders, who by day work as super hotties at the beauty salon, oblivious to the world around them, yet at night fight crime using their mascara applicators and hail curlers, wearing nothing but g-strings and boob tubes. crikey... i might have to rewatch jekyll again now, just to get these damn absurd thought outta my head. |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 05:34
|
|||||
|
i wouldn't say it was boring, it had some good parts, like when you get to see them in bra's... jk this show is very clichee |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 08:16
|
|||||
well, i'm a woman ... but im not gonna bother downloading this one. thanks anyway ez. 
|
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 09:05
|
|||||
| total crap / deleted after seeing 10 minutes and clicking through the rest | |||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 09:33
|
|||||
|
i'm a 33 year old australian female. this is supposedly my demographic. loved satc, lj was a snore as i posted earlier. |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 09:34
|
|||||
|
just downloaded it, haven't watched it yet... i don't care if it's bad, or boring as long as kim raver is in it, i'll watch... |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 13:39
|
|||||
|
aaaarghh!!! i need soap to wash off my retinas! this was awful awful awful |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 14:23
|
|||||
|
idea for a series - nail polish kerfuffle, no wait lipstick jungle sounds better... loving the other pre-airs though
|
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 17:21
|
|||||
|
i didn't think the show was that bad, maybe it's just me, but i can enjoy series like sex and the city even though i am a man. |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 17:31
|
|||||
|
me = woman show = baaaaaad weighing in just so ya'll know you're not all guys here.  i admit, i wasn't interested based on the description. male or female, a show about powerful career _____s doesn't immediately sound like my kind of show. (what can i say, my demographic is "slacker." ) but since ya'll were discussing it, and since it was billed as partly a comedy, i thought what the hell. but when 4 minutes in they started talking about shoes as if objects of importance, i was cringing. overall, the show feels dated, i might've guessed it was some off-brand early 90s movie if i didn't know better. i also thought the acting was uniformly bad. anyway, i could only make it halfway through. i am curious about what makes people think of a show as a "chick show." in this case, i'm sure the sex and the city connection contibuted. but for example, if the show's description was the same but with male leads... "this show tracks three powerful career men who are willing to do almost anything for success in the business world: andy healy, a successful movie executive, victor ford, a high profile architect, and nick reilly, editor-in- chief of a hot selling sports magazine. their thirst for achievement is sure to get them where they want to go--but at what personal cost?" would that influence thinking a show might be a "guy show" instead of a "chick show"? as above, it could be describing a show something like mad men. (which btw i did watch despite the "powerful career _____s" cause i thought it might be cool because of the retro-ness, though ep1 was disappointing.) |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 18:38
|
|||||
|
based on the pilot, this may be a guilty pleasure of mine come this fall... it's definitely watchable; the three leads seem to be better characters than the four in 'sex in the city'. |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 18:56
|
|||||
reaper you say? have you seen the pilot? if so, where'd you find it? edit: never mind, i found it. lol. i am a woman, and i gotta say this was boring. the only chick i was remotely interested in was the fashion designer. why were all the women so...weepy and shit? it was ah-noying. btw, eztv - can you guys post the gossip girl pilot and maybe the cashmere mafia pilot also? i'm actually kinda interested in those (don't make fun of me, boys...) |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 21:14
|
|||||
well, for the record, i am female and i have no interest in seeing this either. why didn't i get the memo about only guys wanting to download them there tv shows off the internets? |
|||||
|
Posted at 26/07/2007, 21:32
|
|||||
|
yikes!! what a disaster!! this is no sex in the city and i don't think the demographic will be fooled. no likeable characters except for lindsay price. surprised to see julian sands and andrew mccarthy. does anybody else notice the slight lisp brook shields seems to have? or is it just my player?? did she burn her tongue or something? i do appreciate the preairs though. |
|||||
|
| 2 of 3 |
|
|||||
Please login to reply.
