|
Please login to reply.
|
|||||
|
Posted at 24/12/2007, 13:20
|
|||||
|
stay tuned for the funny man christmas special review: top gear. much love and a merry christmas to all the funny man fans. |
|||||
|
Posted at 25/12/2007, 09:25
|
|||||
|
funny man christmas special review: top gear arguably the greatest automobile show ever, top gear is witty, humorous and insightful. lead by the one and only jeremy clarkson, the 3-man team of presenters give the audience a feel of watching a bunch of real-life friends interact and play off one another |
|||||
|
Posted at 25/12/2007, 14:17
|
|||||
|
the tame racing driver is named the stig -- and he could kick your ass in any car race. for the tg fans: "some say that he lives in a tree and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals... all we know is, he's called the stig." "some say that his heart ticks like a watch, and that he's confused by stairs... all we know is, he's called the stig." "some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the stig." "some say he never blinks, and that he roams around the woods at night foraging for wolves... all we know is, he's called the stig." p.s.: your grammar is atrocious in your reviews: the word is "whose" not "who's" -- learn to write properly. moreover, the stig is not clarkson; but only someone who has actually watched the show would know that. for example, if clarkson was the stig, at silverstone, how could he be on camera, watching lap times, while stig was on the track racing?! |
|||||
|
Posted at 25/12/2007, 15:05
|
|||||
funny man is here to review shows, not to race cars, you fool. maybe talk to funny cat about racing cars (a dab hand behind a steering wheel). and here's my one "for the "tg fans" ": funny man has just proven top gear to be the worst show ever. the end. (funny man edit): btw, in this case it is "who's". go look it up. and as for clarkson watching himself, sorry "the stick" racing at silverstone, funny man will refer to his previous note of "the stick"'s "skills" being the result of some state of the art editing on the part of the production/editing team. (funny man supposes you think all those characters played by eddie murphy in the nutty professor were completely different people entirely?) so nothing more to add? didn't think so! much love to all the funny man fans. |
|||||
|
Posted at 27/12/2007, 01:21
|
|||||
|
beetman's review of funny man review thread what an utter bunch of drivel, why do i get a feeling that unfunny boy has not watched any of the shows his reviewing... 0/10. |
|||||
|
Posted at 27/12/2007, 02:20
|
|||||
ok so you are over 35yo live in melbourne australia (or at least vic, where joe dolci still does retirement home appearances {captive audience}) about 250kg (500lb) female (or at least think you are because you can't remember the last time you saw/found it, so must be) have cats (can't clean yourself) you steal your wireless internet from the internet cafe next door to the kebab shop you live above would go on, but getting board |
|||||
|
Posted at 27/12/2007, 09:46
|
|||||
|
by reading mazette's eloquent response to the funny man, i vote that she takes over doing the reviews. people will probably care what she's writing about, as opposed to this twits drivel. vote 1 for mazette |
|||||
|
Posted at 27/12/2007, 10:02
|
|||||
|
:lol: dm, you always put a smile on my face!!! |
|||||
|
Posted at 27/12/2007, 21:36
|
|||||
|
hopefully this thread won't get hijacked by an endless parade of flaming and swiping. for better or worse, let funny man do his thing. of course we're all free to ignore his reviews so there's no real harm done. so what's up next? |
|||||
|
Posted at 28/12/2007, 04:09
|
|||||
what a tool..... funny man will continue to review shows in this thread as instructed by an admin of this forum. so if you have an issue with it....simple....stay out of funny man's thread!!! |
|||||
|
Posted at 30/12/2007, 09:02
|
|||||
|
funny man review: monster quest. set to the backdrop of some interesting monsters, this show started off successfully. the first few episodes were insightful, terrifying and original. however, funny man now feels this show has ran out of ideas. the "monsters" they are featuring lately have become ridiculous. and funny man has it on good authority that future episodes will only descend into the ridiculous even more - funny man does not regard a common earwig as a monster and the idea of a giant slug that has been stealing red motorbikes in cleveland just makes funny man laugh. the wobbly camera-work proves to annoy rather than scare, as intended. 4/10 - puzzling but too far fetched. |
|||||
|
Posted at 31/12/2007, 12:53
|
|||||
|
stay tuned for the next funny man review: (as requested) the tudors. much love to all the funny man fans. |
|||||
|
Posted at 01/01/2008, 11:16
|
|||||
funny man says.......no! much love to all the funny man fans in 2008. |
|||||
|
Posted at 02/01/2008, 16:17
|
|||||
|
can't argue much about the monster quest review - the show is pretty lame. would have been more interesting if they could have actually bagged one of them swamp creatures lol. |
|||||
|
Posted at 03/01/2008, 09:04
|
|||||
whatever, noob. stay tuned for the next funny man review: battlestar gallactica. much love to all the funny man fans. |
|||||